Friday, June 16, 2006

What, Me Worry?

Other than the Rasmussen Poll from late May, Bobby Casey has not broken through 50% since at least April and, except for Rasmussen, Casey's numbers are below his high-water marks in every poll.

Is he fading, or is the electorate distracted from the race?

He has a reliable 9-point lead over Santorum, which is gratifying for a challenger. But he can't win in November with 49%.

So, why is his bus tour skipping the areas of the state (Philly & Pittsburgh) which have the most Democrats and the most liberal Democrats? Is he counting on Rendell to deliver those areas for him? Unlike Casey, Rendell has gotten out and about. But, has Casey heard his stump speech? I guess I missed the part where he goes on and on about how much we need Bob Casey in Washington. Or is Casey going to rely on media buys? I guess the latter would be a smart move since he's got so much more money than Santorum does to make those buys . . . oh, wait a minute . . . scratch that. We know it's not all those grassroots door-knocking volunteers that his campaign decided that they don't need.

So, someone tell me, is Casey being complacent, does he have a secret plan, or am I overreacting? (Thanks to Wiki for gathering all the polling data in one place.)

Rasmussen Reports
Source Date Casey (D) Santorum (R)
Rasmussen May 31, 2006 56% 33%
Rasmussen April 27, 2006 51% 38%
Rasmussen April 5, 2006 50% 41%
Rasmussen March 28, 2006 48% 38%
Rasmussen February 20, 2006 52% 36%
Rasmussen January 19, 2006 53% 38%
Rasmussen November 10, 2005 54% 34%
Rasmussen July 22, 2005 52% 41%

Strategic Vision

Source Date Casey (D) Santorum (R)
Strategic Vision June 15, 2006 49% 40%
Strategic Vision May 10, 2006 49% 41%
Strategic Vision April 13, 2006 50% 40%
Strategic Vision March 15, 2006 52% 38%
Strategic Vision January 25, 2006 50% 40%
Strategic Vision December 18, 2005 50% 39%
Strategic Vision November 16, 2005 51% 36%
Strategic Vision October 16, 2005 52% 36%
Strategic Vision September 12, 2005 52% 38%
Strategic Vision July 31, 2005 51% 40%

Quinnipiac University

Source Date Casey (D) Santorum (R)
Quinnipiac May 11, 2006 49% 36%
Quinnipiac April 6, 2006 48% 37%
Quinnipiac February 13, 2006 51% 36%
Quinnipiac December 13, 2005 50% 38%
Quinnipiac October 3, 2005 52% 34%
Quinnipiac July 13, 2005 50% 39%
Quinnipiac April 23, 2005 49% 35%
Quinnipiac February 16, 2005 46% 41%

Keystone

Source Date Casey (D) Santorum (R)
Keystone May 4, 2006 47% 41%
Keystone February 9, 2006 50% 39%
Keystone November 10, 2005 51% 35%
Keystone September 13, 2005 50% 37%
Keystone June 6, 2005 44% 37%
Keystone March 22, 2005 44% 43%

Zogby

Source Date Casey (D) Santorum (R)
Zogby March 30, 2006 47.4% 39.4%
Zogby January 27, 2006 50.5% 38.7%
Zogby January 19, 2006 51.1% 41.4%
Zogby September 13, 2005 51.2% 42.4%

Other Polls

Source Date Casey (D) Santorum (R)
Muhlenberg April 26, 2006 46% 38%
Mansfield University March 7, 2006 45% 31%
Muhlenberg March 4, 2006 49% 37%

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Or maybe what voters are realizing is that in Casey they have an uninspiring stuffed shirt of a candidate running on his father's name and nominated solely by party hacks not on the basis of ideology but rather on that intangible factor known as electability...rather than giving the people of PA a night and day choice, the Dems have chosen a Santorum Lite without personality or appeal except for he's not Rick Santorum. Santorum has also never led in a poll in any of his previous campaigns; he will come back, he will win, and Pennsylvania will be a better state for it.

A Big Fat Slob said...

Okay, well, it could be that.