The Experience Canard

The Audacity of Desperation campaign has long featured slams against Senator Obama's purported lack of experience. Putting aside for the moment how General Powell expertly turned the experience issue against the McCain/Palin ticket, a reality-based examination of the facts shows Obama with more experience than most of the 42 men who have held the office. Not enough? then consider on foreign policy, he's got more experience than four out of the last five Presidents had when they entered office. Still not enough? Well, then consider that "experience" has been as much a predictor of failure as President as any other factor.

John Wilson recently took a look at the facts behind the Repug's experience cackles against Senator Obama. As Mr. Wilson put it: "there are two problems with the attack on Obama's inexperience: it isn't true, and it doesn't matter."

Because the MSM has decided that reviewing the facts is an inefficient way to cover this election, let's spend a moment first taking a look at Senator Obama's resume and experience.

He's a graduate of Columbia University, with a BA in Political Science. His concentration was in international relations and his senior thesis was on Soviet nuclear disarmament.

After Columbia, he worked for as a Writer/Researcher for Business International Corporation (now a part of London's Economist). There he analyzed overseas markets for multinational clients of the firm and wrote for the “Business International Money Report”.

From there, in 1984 he went to the New York Public Interest Research Group, a non-partisan organization that promotes consumer, environmental and government reform. At the NYPIRG, Obama organized student activists at City College in Harlem.

After spending a year at NYPIRG, in 1985 he moved to Chicago, where he became Director of the Developing Communities Project (DCP), a church-based community organization originally comprising eight Catholic parishes in Greater Roseland on Chicago's South Side. While director, he grew the DCP staff from 1 to 13 and their budget from $70,000 to $400,000.

In 1988, Senator Obama entered Harvard Law School. At the end of his first year, based on his grades and a writing competition, he became an editor of the Harvard Law Review. The following year, he was elected President of the law-review, a full-time position in which he supervised the publications 80 editors. During the summers, he worked as a summer associate at a couple of Chicago's prestigious international law firms. He graduated magna cum laude from Harvard in 1991

Following law school, in 1992, he ran Chicago's Project Vote. They registered 600,000 new voters under Obama. From there, the University of Chicago offered him a fellowship, which he used to work on the book that became Dreams of My Father. The fellowship morphed into a teaching position and for over ten years he taught Constitutional law at the law school.

For a portion of the time that he was at the law school, Obama also worked as a civil rights attorney with a Chicago law firm.

In 1996, Obama was elected to the Illinois Senate, in which he served for eight years. Among other things, he was Chairman of the Health and Human Services Committee.

One wouldn't know this from the "liberal elite" MSM coverage, but while in the state senate, Obama earned a reputation for achieving tough legislation by working in a bi-partisan manner. There, he led a successful bipartisan effort to pass the broadest ethics-reform legislation in 25 years, and gained bipartisan support for his successful bills reforming death penalty interrogations and ending racial profiling by police. He also worked with Republicans to reform welfare and sponsored successful bills expanding tax credits and child-care subsidies for low-income working families, protecting overtime pay for workers, expanding health care for children, and providing job skills training for juveniles.

From 1996 through 2002, Obama sponsored over 800 bills in the Illinois State Senate.

In 2004, Obama was elected to serve in the United States Senate. But even his Senate resume is obscured or mispresented in the MSM. In the Senate, he is a Member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and chairs the Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on European Affairs. He's visited 17 countries in those capacities.

In addition, he is a member of the Senate Committees on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, and on Veterans' Affairs.

Senator Obama shares responsibility for the bipartisan Coburn-Obama Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006, requiring full online disclosure of all entities receiving federal funds, and the bipartisan Lugar-Obama Cooperative Proliferation Detection, Interdiction Assistance, and Conventional Threat Reduction Act of 2006, deepening non-proliferation work with WMD and including surface-to-air missiles, land mines, and other weapons that may be used by terrorists. He also worked with Coburn to end the abuse of no-bid contracts in the wake of disasters.

Thomas searches of the 109th and 110th Congressional sessions reveal that, while in the US Senate, Obama has sponsored nearly 300 bills, and been a co-sponsor on nearly 1,000 more. (In the same period, John McCain sponsored a little more than half what Obama sponsored (about180 bills) and co-sponsored less than half of Obama's numbers (around 400).)

I'll bet even those of you supporting Obama didn't know some of this. For the life of me I can't understand why Obama hasn't used some of his small-donation fortune to publicize this impressive record.

So, how does all of this stack up against the troublesome world of fact?

In terms of experience in elected-office, Senator Obama's 15+ years in elective office puts him ahead of 22 of the 42 previous Presidents. Indeed, as Mr. Wilson points out, it gives him more experience in elective office than "that of Ronald Reagan (eight years as governor), Jimmy Carter (four years in state senate, four years as governor), Dwight Eisenhower (no political experience), and Harry Truman (10 years as US senator, one year as vice president)."

Counting only experience in Washington, Obama has more Washington experience than 20 of the prior holders of the office. In short, as Mr. Wilson puts it, "[i]n terms of his experience, Obama would be a typical president."

Foreign policy experience important to you? Well, Senator Obama has served on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee during his entire tenure in the Senate and has visited 17 countries in that capacity. He's got more foreign policy experience than four out of the last five Presidents -- More than Jimmy Carter, more than Ronald Reagan, more than Bill Clinton, and more than that miserable cretin now sullying the office.

That last bit may not be entirely fair -- as Mr. Wilson also points out -- the dry drunk now in office had the benefit of the advice from two Americans with the greatest of experience in foreign policy -- Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld, and look how well that turned out.

So, the experience lie laid bare, how about this -- Wilson compared his review of the experience levels of former Presidents, with a recent evaluation of the success of those Presidential administrations. In 2005, the Federalist Society and the Wall Street Journal selected what they called an "ideologically-balanced" group of 130 prominent professors of history, law, political science and economics to rate the presidents. They then "adjusted" the results to reflect the ideological leanings of the respondents.

Of the top ten-ranked presidents from that survey -- 7 had less experience than Obama. And the worst? All of the five "failed" Presidencies -- the worst Presidents -- featured men with more experience in elected office than Senator Obama.

So, with the experience canard put to rest, maybe McCain and the repugs can start talking about something meaningful, something that is actually important, something with substance. But that's not likely to happen, instead we will hear about Ayers, and Wright, and the socialism canard, anything but reality. Because reality is deadly to Repug prospects.

Summary only...

The Audacity of Desperation

From the smell of the nascent General Election campaign, the Rove-inspired Repugs are trotting out the old reliables -- fear, personal attack, and deflection by deception. I suspect that this "Audacity of Desperation" (to coin a phrase) may become another irregular series here.

On of the latest is a riff by the evil queen of deflection by deception, Michelle Malkin. She all but labels the National Council of La Raza a bunch of racists. The NCLR is the largest, and arguably, one of the most respected Hispanic civil rights and advocacy organizations in the country.

In today's column, Malkin spews out "15 Lies About the NCLR". (Well, maybe it has a slightly different title, but my screen is already turning a brownish-yellow from going to that page and I don't want to turn back again.) Before turning to her bag of burning dogshit, she "explains" to us why the organization is borderline racist:

Only in America could critics of a group called "The Race" be labeled racists. Such is the triumph of left-wing identity chauvinists, whose aggressive activists and supine abettors have succeeded in redefining all opposition as "hate."

Both Barack Obama and John McCain will speak this week in San Diego at the annual conference of the National Council of La Raza, the Latino organization whose name is Spanish for, yes, "The Race."

Uh, no. Either Ms. Malkin is a lying moron, or believes her readers are gullible morons. (Either way, there be morons aplenty over there.) Anyway, as Ms. Malkin surely knows, the organization's name was drawn from the 1926 essay by Mexican philosopher José Vasconcelos called "La Raza Cosmica" ("The Cosmic Peoples"). In that essay, Vasconcelos proposed that the world was conglomerating into what he called a "fifth race" -- representing the commingled product of generations of inter-racial unions. He envisioned a resulting new world order, which he called Universópolis, from which a "new era of humanity" would emerge. Vasconcelos particularly referred to the Latino peoples of the Americas as being, not a single race, "but a conglomerate of races and types". Latinos, went his theory, carried the blood of most of the worlds peoples in their veins and were therefore particularly well-suited to participate in his imagined transcendence of the "old" order dominated by notions of race and nationality.

From this essay, and the concept of a peoples -- a humanity -- transcending tired notions of race by embodying the best of all of the mixed cultures which formed them over generations -- "La Raza" came to symbolize not a monolithic, separate race, but (as the NCLR site puts it) "the mixture inherent in the Hispanic people. This is an inclusive concept, meaning that Hispanics share with all other peoples of the world a common heritage and destiny."

But the facts are just too inconvenient to the desperate status that wingnuts like Malkin see when they look to November. So, instead of dealing with substantive issues, out of audacious desperation, they rely on the twisting of meaning to create something sounding racist out of a slogan drawn from a nearly 100-year old pamphlet trumpeting the coming displacement of racial purity with a humanity and order which moves beyond race itself.

Summary only...